Category: online casino guthaben geschenkt

The Three Musketeers

The Three Musketeers

Film: The Three Musketeers () - uncle.nu: Filme, Kinos, Kinoprogramm, 3D, Charts, DVD, Video, Startdaten, Releases, Trailer und Bilder. Regionalisiert für. The Three Musketeers (Wordsworth Classics) | Alexandre Dumas uncle.nu | ISBN: | Kostenloser Versand für alle Bücher mit Versand und. Directed by Sergey Zhigunov. With Rinal Mukhametov, Yuriy Chursin, Aleksey Makarov, Pavel Barshak. A brand new interpretation of Alexandre Dumas' classic . They all have suffered from great injustice and make their own fates. And what about this angelic saintly Constance? Although D'Artagnan is a sympathetic hero, she effortlessly steals the show every time she appears, just as easily as Sharon Stone upstages Michael Douglas in Basic Instinct. The Beste Spielothek in Bindham finden are pretty broadly drawn, but adequate for the younger audience they're aimed at. I Beste Spielothek in Vorstadt Steindamm finden them, and I enjoy reading their adventures, casino verzeichnis I cheer for them from beginning to end. I think this is why this part is long and without interruption. Dan valt er best wat te genieten. The alternative spelling of "Roy" was taken from the old French and is rumoured to be preferred over the regular spelling because the publisher's desire to have a letter "Y" play germany the name of the games they publish. Athos and he share the money. Play online casino games free 19, J rated it it was amazing.

The Three Musketeers Video

The Three Musketeers (2011) New HD Trailer #2 - Movie Trailer

A Touch of History. Share this Rating Title: The Three Musketeers 5. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin.

Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Milady de Winter Helen George Venetian Nobleman Luke Evans Sergeant Venetian Guard Orlando Bloom Duke of Buckingham Logan Lerman D'Artagnan's Father Jane Perry D'Artagnan's Mother Mads Mikkelsen Every legend has a new beginning.

Edit Details Official Sites: Dolby Digital Datasat Dolby Surround 7. Edit Did You Know? The Legend of Fritton's Gold Goofs at around 1h 30 mins D'Artagnan's legs are throwing double shadows.

One to his rear, one to his front, revealing the studio location for this shot. There's one more piece of advice. I know, I know. Don't get into any trouble.

And remember, always, you're a Gascon and our son. Crazy Credits At the end of the movie, the first credits have a dedication,"For Bernd", referencing Bernd Eichinger, who died in January of He was producer of 4 of the Resident Evil films, also directed by Paul W.

Connections Referenced in Bad Movie Beatdown: Add the first question. Ik voor mij zou het helemaal niet erg vinden als er een vervolg kwam.

Popcornvermaak waar het originele verhaal van The Three Musketeers ver te zoeken is. Het vermoeiende begin zit vol met flauwe humor, onzinnige dialogen en stoere tienerpraatjes.

Na bijna een half uur krijgt het verhaal gelukkig wat meer vorm en lijkt het ook ergens heen te gaan, zonder ook maar een moment echt goed te worden.

Vanaf dat moment kijkt het wel redelijk weg, om vrij snel daarna weer af te zwakken. Oppervlakkige en matige fantasierijke avonturenfilm, waarbij de slechte cgi en het zwakke acteerwerk opvallen.

Leuk voor wie van wie van zwaardgevechten houdt of graag een gevecht tussen vliegende schepen ziet, geheel in de stijl van het zoveelste vervolg op Pirates of the Caribbean.

Van deze film had ik helemaal niets verwacht. De versie uit de jaren 90 vond ik namelijk maar mager. Maar deze film is super! Iedereen is goed gecast, leuk verhaal, humor, goede actie en hele mooie effecten.

Dat oorlogsschip is toch fantastisch. Tja moeilijk waar DArtagnan mij alleen irriteert is het lastig als het verhaal om hem draait.

Humor kwam ook niet best uitde hoek. Blijft ook jammer dat je ondanks talloze gevechten niet of nauwelijks een spatje bloed ziet.

Luie Evans speelde zoals altijd goed, Bloom en Waltz wat tegenvallende prestaties. En Milla doet het geweldig. Al met al redelijke film maar geef mij de versie met Charlie Sheen etc maar.

Heb hem afgelopen jaren denk ik al 3 keer gezien, blijft leuk en ontzettend entertainend. Een hoop bekende koppen in de cast, een film met vaart en veel actie die prima wegkijkt.

Best leuk, maar ook niet meer dan dat. Een redelijk grappige film met leuke actie. Maar af en toe voorspelbaar en een beetje saai.

Wel een paar bekenden als: Orlando Bloom en Milla Jovovich. Een aardige film en niet meer dan dat.

Een hele rits aan bekende gezichten in deze hervertelling van het welbekende verhaal. Helaas is het verhaal al veel te vaak beter gedaan , waardoor deze film gewoon geen goede indruk maakt.

De wel erg plastische decors vond ik zo nu en dan ook een beetje om te janken. Anderson heeft iets teveel zijn best gedaan om er een visueel spektakel van te maken.

De film weet hier en daar zeker te vermaken , maar ik heb wel beter gezien. O nee 3 musketiers. Het heeft allemaal niets om het lijf maar het ziet er spectaculair uit, is grappig, vermakelijk en duurt niet te lang.

Ik werd hier gisteravond ontzettend vrolijk van. Leuke soundtrack ook trouwens. Jammer dat dit zo geflopt is destijds, The Three Musketeers had meer verdiend.

Het paleis van Wurzburg dat door moet gaan voor een Frans paleis Bijzonder slappe versie van de 3 musketiers. Teveel matig tot slechte scenes.

Spannend wordt het ook nergens. Geinig om een keer gezien te hebben maar geen aanrader. Ook pijnlijk dat ze opzichtig hinten naar een tweede deel.

Maar die komt er dus niet. Redelijke film over een jongeman die zich aansluit bij de drie musketiers.

Het welbekende verhaal, met hier en daar wel wat wijzigingen. De personages weten niet echt te boeien, en de film had wat korter mogen zijn.

Wel mooi aangekleed, met mooie kostuums en sets. Ook de actie-scenes zijn hier en daar wel de moeite waard, waardoor het nog wel gemakkelijk wegkijkt.

Redelijk vermaak met een goede cast, alleen vond ik het verhaal wat simpel, de humor wat flauw en het is allemaal wat over de top!

Bij een Resident Evil kan ik de over de top actie meer waarderen dan bij een verhaal als deze. En nog een verfilming over The Three Musketeers. Hoewel het verhaaltje standaard is, heb ik me bij deze versie goed vermaakt.

Vooral met die luchtschepen. De personages vond ik niet geweldig gekozen op de dames na dan. Nee, blijf toch bij de oldtimer versie uit Nog niet de originele films gezien, maar toen deze eens op tv kwam toch maar aangezet.

Vooral de cast sprak me wel aan. Waltz, Mikkelsen, Lerman en Evans etc. Ook van de makers van Resident Evil, dus qua special effects was het wel ok.

Verhaal was alleen soms wat saai en vreemd. Jovovich was soms irritant en speelde haar rol niet met overtuiging. The Three Musketeers zelf waren wel lollig.

Ook de rest van de cast was wel ok, alleen Waltz viel me wat tegen. Goed vermaak, soms wat saai maar genoeg gevechten en spektakel om je voldoende geboeid te houden.

In der Zwischenzeit ist Constance von Richelieu entführt worden. Doch die Fehlentscheidung bei der Wahl des Regisseurs liegt zu schwer. Von Mark O'Neill am 2. Doch auch dieser Versuch wird vereitelt, und zwar von Mordaunt, der sich als Henker anbietet - denn ein Teil des Planes sah vor, dass der Henker von London entführt werden sollte. Onlinecasino.de bonus 3,9 von 5 Sternen. Das Schiff explodiert, in Brand gesteckt von Mordaunt, der als online fogadás der Besatzung noch rechtzeitig ins Wasser springt. Juni um

Three, however, refuse to throw down their swords - Athos the fighter and drinker, Porthos the pirate and lover, and Aramis the priest and poet.

Arriving in Paris to join the Musketeers, D'Artagnan uncovers the Cardinal's plans, and the four set out on a mission to protect King and Country.

Nope, it's by no means an accurate adaptation of Dumas' original work. Umm, does nanyone really care? This movie sets out to more or less capture the feel of such films, rather than the source material itself.

In that regard, it's not too badly done. The characters are pretty broadly drawn, but adequate for the younger audience they're aimed at. Sutherland, Platt, and Sheen all seem way too young, but at least the first two are entertaining.

Platt in particular manages to steal every scene he's in. By the same token, Richelieu's character is simplified to "generic bad guy. Overall, I'd recommend the movie for some light entertainment, but don't take it too seriously.

Visit Prime Video to explore more titles. Find showtimes, watch trailers, browse photos, track your Watchlist and rate your favorite movies and TV shows on your phone or tablet!

Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Alexandre Dumas novel , David Loughery screenplay. Our Favorite Trailers of the Week.

Everything Coming to Hulu in December Share this Rating Title: The Three Musketeers 6. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin.

Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Cardinal Richelieu Rebecca De Mornay Why can't marry D'Artagnan and Constance?

He even makes friends with Roquefort in the novel! But Lady de Winter is the devil, killing everyone without regret. Would like to have a novel or book about her.

And the "true story". Leah Angstman And as for the fourth Musketeer? How about the fact that he posed as someone else to gain entry into a woman's bedchamber to have relations with her a And as for the fourth Musketeer?

How about the fact that he posed as someone else to gain entry into a woman's bedchamber to have relations with her after she'd refused him?

Apparently no big deal in this book? I found that maddening. I don't care if it is a different time period; non-consensual sex is never okay This book was not good.

All for one and one for all. Probably THE most well-known quote from any book in history. From then on, it is a swashbuckling adventure full of intrigues, sword fights, heartbreak and much more.

The story has been adapted too many times to count them all, making the names of the Musketeers as immortal as those of their adversaries: Alexandre Dumas has written what I call a true classic.

It is a pure satire about all layers of society from the ruling nobility and the Church to the poorest farmer. The author makes equal fun of what was supposedly honorable, how easily love was declared, how people were constantly in debt the rich as much as the poor , about what useless and ridiculous topics clerics argued and philosophized, reasons for loyalty and so much more.

Therefore, you have to read this adventure story with more than just one grain of salt. However, considering the age of the tale, it is all the more remarkable how modern it is written.

They all have suffered from great injustice and make their own fates. They stand opposite men like Athos, who hung his wife simply for a brand, not even listening to the story of how it was given it was given justly, for sure, but at the time he didn't know that!

We have the politics of the day nicely interwoven in this social critique. The Battle of La Rochelle, the ever changing loyalties of certain provinces and cities.

These are but a few examples as there are many more people and aspects here. The people breathe life into an action-packed story of politics, religion, treachery, love, and friendship before a most intricately drawn background.

Dumas has an impeccable writing style as well. I have to point out how ageless the story is, but the engaging, colorful writing style that so perfectly conveys the scorn and mockery of the ways of life portrayed here makes it a delight to read and doesn't give away the book's age at all.

View all 46 comments. A young man named D'Artagnan is sent to Paris with three gifts from his father: It is he who commands the king's musketeers. And she will also fall in love with Constance Bonacieux.

Since this can not be said publicly about the feelings of one another, she marries the king of France. Anne gives them some diamond pendants as consolation prize du A young man named D'Artagnan is sent to Paris with three gifts from his father: Anne gives them some diamond pendants as consolation prize during their trip back to England.

The Cardinal, nefarious, is the greatest power in France, even greater than the king. He who is still angry at Anne for having burned his love statements for some time, wants her to get in trouble with her husband.

He knows through his spies that Anne gave the Buckingham diamonds. He suggests that the King throw a party and ask Anne to wear the diamonds, she despairs and burst into tears.

Madame Bonacieux promises that she will find someone to help retrieve the queen's pendants in time. This someone turns out to be D'Artagnan, who ended up stumbling over him to get his thanks.

He takes his friends, Athos, Porthos and Aramis to England to retrieve the gifts, but one by one is stopped on the road.

D'Artagnan goes to London alone and meets the duke. He finds the pendants, but two are missing. To solve the problem, the Duke blocks any ship from leaving England to ensure that the musketeers do not return to Paris.

But D'Artgnan returns to Paris in time to save the queen. Madame Bonacieux is ready to go to meet D'Artagnan, she does not appear and D'Artagnan waits in vain, after he discovers that she has been kidnapped.

He finds Porthos and Aramis in two inns along the way, but both wounded. D'Artagnan discovers that the king is recommending him to become a musketeer.

This joy is short lived, however, as all men must somehow earn enough money to equip themselves properly for war.

Porthos and Aramis appeal to their lovers, and D'Artagnan sleeps with a noble in exchange for a valuable ring. Athos and he share the money.

Friends find themselves well funded and ready for war. The problem is that D'Artagnan slept with Milady, who is an agent of the cardinal.

Not only did he sleep with her, but he also discovered her secret: She sends two murderers to kill him with some poisoned wine, but he escapes twice.

Meanwhile, Athos, Porthos and Aramis listen to the conversation between the cardinal and Milady.

She is accused of going to England and persuading someone to murder the Duke of Buckingham. Milady wants D'Artagnan dead.

The musketeers decide to send a footman from Tours, with a warning letter to the queen of the conspiracy against Buckingham, and sends another footman from England about the arrival of Milady.

When Milady arrives, she is escorted to a comfortable room in a castle above the cliff. Milady soon corrupts her jailer and convinces him that she is an innocent woman.

The jailer releases her and puts her on a ship, and then he stabs the duke to death. Milady embraces to France, and destined to a convent where Constance Bonacieux is hidden.

D'Artagnan is very happy with the queen's word to meet Constance and take her away from the convent. He arrives too late, Milady poisons Constance, and she dies in the arms of D'Artagnan.

The four friends trace Milady and bring her to trial, where they hear the lengths of her crimes. The key to it is death.

The cardinal asks D'Artagnan, he is afraid that the cardinal will sentence him to death, but the cardinal, knowing that Milady is dead, changes his mind and gives d'Artagnan the position of lieutenant of the Musketeers.

After nearly 5 years of owning this book, I've finally read it thanks to Rincey hosting the readalong this month that gave me the motivation.

I can't say I loved the book, but it was fun and had its moments. It's sort of a bunch of vignettes, especially at the beginning, to acquaint you with the characters.

And then the real plot sort of develops later on in the novel. It has all those follies and foibles of classics, with misdirection, confusion, deus ex machinas galore, and is, at times, a t After nearly 5 years of owning this book, I've finally read it thanks to Rincey hosting the readalong this month that gave me the motivation.

It has all those follies and foibles of classics, with misdirection, confusion, deus ex machinas galore, and is, at times, a tad ridiculous.

But I can see the appeal and would definitely love to watch an adaptation of this story! Cheers to tackling behemoth books that sit on your shelf for ages.

May 13, J. Keely rated it it was amazing Shelves: I have been, on occasion, accused of some sort of self-set elitism which suffuses my opinions and critiques on literature.

It seems people are often more likely to think one has an ulterior motive for liking or not liking a book rather than looking at the presented arguments.

In any case, I would posit this book as the countermand to that sentencing. It is not a literary book, as such, as it does not place itself in a deep referential or metaphorical state.

Though it is certainl Remarkable book. Though it is certainly influenced by many great works, it is, in its whole, no more nor less than the reigning king of the pulp adventures.

Built on the ridiculous, the humorous, the exciting, and deeply in the characters, this work creates a world of romance in that oh-so-classic sense and adventure which conscripts the reader and delivers him to the front lines.

I am alway amazed by this book's ability to invoke lust, pity, wonder, respect, scorn, and hatred, all while driving along a plot filled with new events and characters.

Should there be any future for Fantasy, it lies not in the hands of Tolkien-copying machines, nor even in Moorecock's 'un-fantasy', but in whatever writer can capture Beowulf , The Aeneid , The Three Musketeers , or The White Company and make a world which is exciting not because everything is magical and strange, but because everything is entirely recognizable, but much stranger.

Of course, one may want to avoid going Mervyn Peake 's route with this, and take a lesson from the driving plot and carefree frivolity that Dumas Pere and his innumerable ghostwriters adhered to.

It is amusing here to note that Dumas has accredited to his name far more books than he is likely to have ever written.

As he was paid for each book with his name on it, he made a sort of 'writing shop' where he would dictate plots, characters, or sometimes just titles to a series of hired writers and let them fill in the details.

So, praises be to Dumas or whichever of his unrecognized hirees wrote such a work. View all 3 comments. I've had more fun reading "The Three Musketeers" than I've had with any book in a long time, and my only regret is that I didn't find my way to Dumas sooner.

It's bursting with swordplay, political intrigue, romance, fortunes won and lost, mistresses kept and stolen, poisoned wine, devious nobility, and vengeance sought and attained.

What more could a reader ask for? While "The Three Musketeers" isn't the most intellectually challenging book ever written -- though it does offer, in passing, the I've had more fun reading "The Three Musketeers" than I've had with any book in a long time, and my only regret is that I didn't find my way to Dumas sooner.

While "The Three Musketeers" isn't the most intellectually challenging book ever written -- though it does offer, in passing, the occasional insight into the human race -- it might be the best guilty-pleasure book of all time.

And while it's long for such a book at plus pages, not a word is wasted. Is there a more intriguing villainess in literature than Milady?

A more fascinating hate-him-one-moment, forgive-him-the-next character than Cardinal Richelieu? And that's not to ignore d'Artagnan, who, with a youthful foolhardiness and energy that eventually gives way to gravitas, only the hardest hearted of readers could not love.

And while Porthos, Aramis and Athos may spend most of the book as flat characters -- and I'm using that term the same way E.

Forster does, not as an insult but to distinguish them from multifaceted, "round" characters -- they each have their more complex moments, Athos especially.

I do have one minor complaint about "The Three Musketeers. And while Milady's corruption of Felton does have its interests, we as readers don't spend enough time with him ahead of it to really feel as bad as we should.

But this is a minor quibble. As should be obvious by my five stars, which I give unreservedly, I really did love the book on the whole.

And, on a side note, I like that "The Three Musketeers" concludes with a brief what-happened-to-each-character section, something Dumas did long before the film "Animal House" or Van Halen's "Hot for Teacher" video.

And this, by the way, may mark a rare time Van Halen and Dumas are mentioned in the same sentence. Someone please Google that to make sure. Anne I have exactly the same complaint about the Milady section.

It was interesting, but I missed my Musketeers. As far as the Musketeers being flat charac I have exactly the same complaint about the Milady section.

As far as the Musketeers being flat characters, I agree with you. But my favorite chapters in the whole book were the ones when d'Artagnan re-traces his road to London and sees what his friends have been up to.

Is there anything funnier than Porthos and his sprained knee? Aramis and his thesis? Athos and Grimaud eating their way through the innkeeper's cellar and then of course how that chapter goes from laugh-out-loud funny to deadly serious in the course of one page?

That was what made the book for me. I didn't even need the overall plot arc. Manash You know I have a theory about why Dumas made that Milady section so long.

I just finished with the book today - yesterday evening I was at that part, You know I have a theory about why Dumas made that Milady section so long.

I just finished with the book today - yesterday evening I was at that part, where Milady was hunting Felton. You know, I suddenly felt one thing that absolutely horrified me - the villainess struck a terror into my heart even from inside the pages of the book!

You actually feel, though you know it is not true, that she is a beautiful damsel being rescued by her hero.

And then when you continue reading and get to that part when Felton challenges the Duke in his chamber, - it really reads like the Duke is a criminal whose punishment is at hand.

You perfectly know what is going on really, but the atmosphere created is such! I think this is why this part is long and without interruption.

Dec 11, Jessica rated it liked it. Well, it was no Count of Monte Cristo, but it was still exciting and dramatic. I was much more into the second half, when it starts focusing on the diabolical Lady de Winter.

One disappointment was that I had always envisioned the Three Musketeers to be noble, just, Robin Hood-type characters.

It turns out that, though brave, they are quite selfish and immoral, and tend to murder people with little provocation.

None of the musketeers was very likable to me. Women also don't fare very well here a Well, it was no Count of Monte Cristo, but it was still exciting and dramatic.

Women also don't fare very well here and are talked about in quite unsettling terms. Dumas definitely has a gift for dialogue, though, and it's hard not to be sucked into his world of intrigue and passion.

Sep 16, Manny rated it really liked it Shelves: For the Celebrity Death Match Review Tournament , The Lord of the Rings 2 versus Les Trois Mousquetaires 31 Three musketeers for the elven kings under the sky Seven for the dwarf-lords in their halls of stone Nine for mortal man, doomed to die One for Cardinal Richelieu It's a beautiful afternoon here at the Coliseum, and they're cleaning up after the Lions v Christians fixture Christians lost as usual, ha ha View all 21 comments.

I'm really at a loss as to how I should review this book. I'm burdened with mixed feelings, both positive and negative. They are equally strong that I'm not sure how I exactly feel about the book.

I will not venture to state the story or any part of it, for there cannot be many who have not read it, or if not, have watched a movie adaptation.

I will only express what I felt for the story, the characters, and writing. First I'll begin with the writing. This is Dumas's forte.

The exhibition of wit I'm really at a loss as to how I should review this book. The exhibition of wit and humour coupled with his ability to create an intriguing tale, keeping the reader in suspense as to what would unfold, is amazing.

Over and over he has displayed his mastery in writing, making him one of the wide read and popular French Classicists. Here too was no exception.

The story is a mixture of fiction with an actual historical account of the events that unfolded in the court of Louise XIII of France, and in England, focusing on George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham, at the time of siege la Rochelle.

The roles played by France and England in this siege, and the power struggle between these two great enemies at the time divided by religion is well portrayed.

This allowed the reader to gain a good insight as to the history while enjoying the fictitious story. All these inclusions made the book an interesting read, and a quick page turner.

Now to the characters, and this is where I fell out with the book. However, to do justice to Dumas, I will admit that though some characters had been presented with favour, others have been presented neutrally, letting the readers be their judges.

While I accepted D'Artagnen in the favourable light in which he was portrayed for the most part, I couldn't do the same for the three Musketeers.

If Cardinal Richelieu, Comte de Rochefort and cardinal's guards were bad, the actions of the defending King's musketeers were equally bad.

Though the author tried his best to justify them, he utterly failed before my tribunal. The only favoured character that Dumas and I could fully agree on was Madame Bonacieux, the truly loyal servant of the persecuted Anne of Austria, the Queen of France.

However, surprisingly my interest was piqued and held by those characters Dumas has portrayed neutrally. Cardinal Richelieu is one.

Though I wouldn't for the life of me sanction his actions and his persecution towards the Queen, he was not despicable as I expected him to be.

My Lady De Winter is another story. She is a novelty in the history of classics. A heartless, vengeful woman with an evil disposition, she was the only character I found who roused my emotions.

If I may say so, I despised her with passion and didn't feel any remorse at her tragic death. Overall, however, keeping my personal perceptions on the characters at bay, I was able to enjoy it.

For the time being, the answer is probably not. I'm not enamoured enough with the Musketeers to indulge myself immediately with the sequels.

I have read the synopsis of the two and feel I might be able to enjoy the actual historical account which is delicately entwined with the fictitious story.

But when may I lay my hands on them is a question the future will answer. View all 14 comments. It has took me longer than usual to get through this book, but hell, there are so many amazing books to be devoured!

The Three Musketeers is an exquisite adventure story, with the "Fun" element on overdrive! I mean, this is classic literature with a twist.

I just loved the sword fights and the utter sarcasm. The writing style Dumas uses flows with such ease, and is very humorous.

I found myself howling a lot more than I thought I would! I loved the relationship between the Musketeers and how ver It has took me longer than usual to get through this book, but hell, there are so many amazing books to be devoured!

I loved the relationship between the Musketeers and how very different each one is. We definitely have a bromance here! I see enjoyed the fact that the Musketeers just kicked ass, and in a highly debonair fashion.

My favourite excerpt; "D'Artagnan, in a state of fury, crossed the antechamber at three bounds, and was darting towards the stairs, which he reckoned upon descending four at a time, when, in his heedless course, he ran head foremost against a Musketeer who was coming out of one of M.

De Treville's private rooms, and striking his shoulder violently, made him utter a cry, or rather a howl. I'm surprised that d'Artagnan and his three friends in so many people eyes are heroes and "good" guys.

Because they are not. Author has made cruelty, crime and sinful deeds OK if its done by "inseparable" friends and cloaked it in heroism and gallantry.

I had a lot what-the-heck moments. The book is full of "Duma's occasional lapses of memory" However the story is interesting and the book is a true page turner.

View all 9 comments. Apr 26, Lizzy rated it really liked it Shelves: Ame este libro, y creo que si alguna vez viste alguna de las versiones hollywoodenses y te gusto, debes leer el libro, porque como todo lector sabe, el libro es mejor, y en este caso es mucho, mucho mejor.

May 19, J rated it it was amazing. There exist in the world authors from previous eras whose characters have become so ubiquitous in the popular culture that they undergo a strange kind of infantalizing.

The rather serious philosophical questions Robert Louis Stevenson posed about mind-body duality and evolution are passed over in favor of the monster story of wicked Mr.

And even as I knew this, I There exist in the world authors from previous eras whose characters have become so ubiquitous in the popular culture that they undergo a strange kind of infantalizing.

And even as I knew this, I steadfastly avoided reading the works of Alexandre Dumas pere, considering his most well known work, The Three Musketeers , as nothing more than an early proto-swashbuckling Saturday matinee serial.

Plus, there was the length consideration. Dumas wrote by the line and it shows, at least in the heft of any one particular volume of his work.

Well, as it turns out, I do. The basics of the plot are relatively well known: It is as if a book written over a hundred years ago entitled The Three Corporals had elevated that rank to nobility.

We clearly discover throughout the book that most of the musketeers are bullies and ruffians, even our heroes are not without their bad points.

It is a rare moment when our heroes come into contact with gunpowder. His characters are all distinctly drawn, Aramis with his holy orders and quiet philosophy, Athos with his distinguished paternalism and deep sorrow, and Porthos with his loud and brash manner and his vanity.

Likewise the enemies they are up against, the smoothly evil and calculating Richelieu; the seductive, brilliant hellcat that is Milady, a stronger female in literature nowhere to be found; and the dangerous Comte de Rochefort, a shadowy presence of malevolence.

It becomes clear rather quickly too that Dumas had an extraordinary gift for the cliffhanger style and the miraculous escape, double-crosses and triple-crosses filling out the bill all the way.

Mistaken identities and figures hidden in cloaks and masks populate the novel in every shadow, every corner, and every darkened hallway.

Probably no greater advertising for the Machiavellian schemes of Cardinal Richelieu ever existed or was more broadly bruited about than this novel.

At every turn, at the moment when the Musketeers or their allies think that they may have gotten the best of the Cardinal, like an octopus, his tentacles are everywhere at once, grasping at every likelihood.

His agents are in every corner of the country, his name whispered fearfully by every innkeeper and tavern wench, the King in his pocket.

He is almost evenly matched by his agent Milady, more cunning than a snake. The scenes in which she seduces her jailer Felton are some of the most exciting and suspenseful in the novel, and next to nothing happens in every one.

Thus it is that the author must manage pretty fast footwork for his heroes if they are to have any hope of outwitting the Cardinal. Yet all of this sounds distinctly like good fun for younger readers.

Which is the strange magic of Dumas. A six hundred page novel passes in barely the time it takes shorter books to lose your attention near the middle.

The cliffhanger style chapter endings pull you along ever deeper into the book. Even though I was listening to an audiobook most of the time, I had to pull down a copy off my shelf, never before cracked open, and read ahead after hours.

It even lit a fire under me to read and listen to more Dumas, propelling me to the next book, the nearly twice as long Count of Monte Cristo.

Happy adventuring awaits should you follow this path. May 17, [P] rated it really liked it. This was good fun. Throughout — wrist taxing, if not brain taxing — pages Dumas leads us, his readers, a merry dance across France [and occasionally England], without ever really acknowledging the absurdity and joyful irreverence of his narrative.

Indeed, The Three Musketeers is so absurd as to approach the level of evil genius. Perhaps influenced by movies and popular culture references I came to the book expecting a [at least semi] serious novel, whose action revolves around politics and the pursuit of power.

I also expected royal intrigues and double-dealing, vengeance and murder plots. In this review I have already made use of words such as irreverent and ridiculous and absurd, and yet there is probably a better one: Hundreds of miles travelled, people injured, lives put at risk, and all to recover some diamonds for a party.

Indeed, a lot of what the characters do, how they behave and react, is disproportionate, is over the top when one considers what has caused their reactions or motivated their behaviour.

What about crude characterisation? Well, it is certainly the case that there is absolutely no psychological depth to any of the characters.

They all have some feature, some trait, that defines them and to which they stick till the end of the novel. So, Aramis is the sensitive, reluctant musketeer, Buckingham is in love, Milady is obsessed with revenge, Athos is philosophical, and so on.

The thing is, I am not complaining, nor am I criticising. There is, to my mind, nothing wrong with farce, especially when it is pulled off with such panache and wit.

It is not easy to create memorable characters, be they one, two or three dimensional. Nor is a great sense of humour less impressive than complex psychological portraits.

On this, The Three Musketeers is, at times, very very funny. And you commend me to Satan. Milady is absolutely bad-ass.

I guess if you wanted to credit the book with greater depth or intelligence, if you wanted to say it is something more than a brilliant farce, then you could argue that it is a satire.

One of the most interesting features of the book is that the people who hold the highest positions, by which I mean kings etc, are, for the most part, the stupidest, most self-obsessed characters.

Certainly, the King of France is ridiculed more than anyone else. He is shown as being a petty, jealous, easily bored and easily duped man.

There is a scene near the beginning when he has his wife searched, because he believes that she has a love letter on her person.

When he recovers the letter and finds out that it is not a love letter but a traitorous one he is happy!

Indeed, the war between the English and the French only takes place because Buckingham wants an excuse to be in France in order to see the Queen.

It seems that Dumas is saying that wars etc are not waged for the reasons that we think, for religion or ideology or power.

The thing is, I think you could make too much of all that, If Dumas was trying to be scathing, you would expect that the musketeers, being the heroes, would condemn this kind of behaviour from the king et al.

In fact, they accept it. The musketeers are likeable, no doubt, but their own morals are iffy to say the least. This is why I call the novel dumb fun or a great farce, because no one is entirely good and certainly no one is treated entirely seriously.

The power of the book is not in its message but in making of the reader a Don Quixote, so that upon finishing it one is eager to take up a sword and romp around the country in a fancy outfit challenging people to duels.

Or is that just me? In any case…en guarde, you scoundrels! View all 10 comments. Mar 15, Abigail Amor rated it it was amazing Shelves: The book did not disappoint.

All for one and one for all! Yes Two is better than one. Yet three is much better than two. There is something happening every chapter. Fast paced and adventurous it is.

It's also a little amusing how extremely formal the book is, even the insults are too formal. Overall, The Three Musketeers is a book that one must read even once in his life for it is certainly worth the read.

Week 7 5 18 Jun 12, NO spoilers Mar 19,

D'Artagnan sings and fronts for slapstick cowardly Ritz brothers posing as musketeers. Public domain und Wikipedia: Alle 20 Rezensionen anzeigen. Buckingham und die Königin treffen sich zu einem Stelldichein und Anna überreicht Buckingham zwölf Diamantspangen als Andenken. I do say there is none that I love so wholly. Ansichten Lesen Bearbeiten Quelltext bearbeiten Versionsgeschichte. Nach ihrem siegreichen Kampf müssen die vier erkennen, dass es besser ist zusammenzuarbeiten, um den König vor Richelieus Komplott zu bewahren. Alle kostenlosen Kindle-Leseanwendungen anzeigen. Daher darf diese Datei in deutschsprachigen Wikimedia-Projekten wie der Wikipedia oder dem Wiktionary möglicherweise nicht verwendet werden. Kardinal Richelieu Freddie Fox: Diese Seite wurde zuletzt am Von Mark O'Neill am 2. Use the HTML below. Anna of Austria Anna Starshenbaum

The Three Musketeers -

The 'sex' scenes were over way to quickly. Navigation Hauptseite Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel. In anderen Projekten Commons. Beschreibung Beschreibung The Three Musketeers 1. Durch die Nutzung dieser Website erklären Sie sich mit den Nutzungsbedingungen und der Datenschutzrichtlinie einverstanden. August um Teilen Facebook Twitter Pinterest. Start your free trial. Was ich bis jetzt sagen kann: Amazon Business Kauf auf Rechnung. Ich entdecke gerade die klassischen Abenteuerromane wieder. November Beste Spielothek in Haunkenzell finden D. Navigation Hauptseite Themenportale Zufälliger Artikel. Gekauft habe ich es mir, weil ich die originale Story lesen wollte. A wonderfully written, absorbing paypal com and I Beste Spielothek in Hoske finden wait for part 2 in the Musketeers trilogy.

0 Responses

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *